
The Government is strengthening Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) by removing the waiting period, meaning SSP will become payable from the day 1 of sickness absence.
For employers, this goes beyond a simple payroll adjustment. It could mean:
If your business isn’t operationally prepared, the financial and compliance risks could escalate quickly.
Read on to understand what’s changing and what you should be doing now to protect your organisation.
Currently, SSP is only payable from the fourth qualifying day of sickness (the first three days unpaid, unless your company offers contractual sick pay).
The three waiting days will be removed, meaning employers will pay SSP from day 1 of absence. Annual increases in April will see the SSP rate also increase, adding further financial burden, which will be felt by small to medium sized business.
As protections increase, so too will expectations that employers have clear systems, fair processes, and accurate recordkeeping.
These changes are expected to come into force in April 2026.
When SSP becomes payable from day one, the financial and operational implications are significant:
For small and medium-sized businesses in particular, even a modest increase in short-term absence can materially affect margins.
The question is no longer “Will this affect us?”
It’s “Are we operationally prepared?”
Preparation isn’t just about updating payroll settings. It requires a structured review of your processes, policies, and people capability.
Below are the key areas every employer should be reviewing now.
Your sickness absence policy must:
Outdated policies increase legal exposure and reduce managerial confidence. Now is the time to ensure your documentation is compliant, clear, and enforceable. With day-one SSP, short absences carry greater cost.
You should ask:
Triggers that are too high may fail to control absence, and those that are poorly applied create inconsistency and potential employee relations issues.
This is an opportunity to recalibrate your approach; accurate recordkeeping will become even more critical. Businesses will need to consider:
If you rely on spreadsheets or informal tracking, you may lack audit trails and reporting accuracy. An online absence management platform, such as oneHR can:
This not only improves compliance, but it also improves control.
Policy alone doesn’t manage absence; managers do! We recommend that all businesses assess:
Inconsistent manager capability is one of the biggest risk factors in absence management. With strengthened SSP, training becomes essential, not optional!
Training should cover:
Well-trained managers reduce absence costs, improve employee relations, and protect the business from claims.
We recommend you review your End-to-End Absence Process, step back and examine your full process:
For many businesses, implementing these changes internally is time-consuming and complex. HPC are on hand to support, we can:
Rather than reacting to rising absence costs, you can proactively build a structured, defensible, and cost-controlled approach.
Don’t wait for costs to rise. When SSP becomes payable from day one, short-term absence will immediately carry a greater financial impact. Businesses that rely on outdated policies, informal tracking, or untrained managers may see costs increase quickly.
Those who act now by reviewing processes, strengthening policies, improving recordkeeping, and investing in manager capability will be best placed to manage the change confidently and compliantly.
The reform is coming. The question is: will your absence management framework be ready?
To find out more information or for support managing absence within your company, get in contact with our team of experts.
T: 0330 107 1037
LinkedIn: High Performance Consultancy